"God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom always to tell the difference." (209)
This quote appears a few times throughout the novel. Not to mention the fact that I have heard it more times than I can count after going to a Catholic School for thirteen years. However, this quote is especially applicable to Billy. In this instance, it is on a locket on Montana's neck. Earlier in the book it was on the wall of his office. I think that this is probably a flashback and possibly the first time he read it. I think that when he saw it there, he realized that it made sense. It applied to him, so he never wanted to forget it. There is also the possibility that this was just a subtle reminder of what he already had hanging in his office. I am a little unsure of where he is in time at this moment. Anyways, this quote applies to all of us, but now I will describe how it pertains to Billy. Billy cannot change that he was in war. He cannot change that he has watched his friends and countless other victims die. He can change the way he lives his own life when he is home. He can serve his country and community to the best of his ability. He can be an example of kindness in a world full of hatred and violence. He needs to realize the difference. He needs to focus on what he can change rather than reflecting and despising a past that will never change. He needs to have the courage to live a good life and wisdom to understand that the past is the past so that he can move on and live the present.
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Slaughterhouse-Five: 9
"There address was this: "Schlacthof-funf." Schlacthof meant slaughterhouse. Funf was good old five."
This post will be a reaction. At the tail end of the sixth chapter appears the title of the novel. I think this is always a good thing to reflect upon. Why is it mentioned now? Why is this the title of the novel? I will now give my take on the two questions. I think that it is mentioned now because it is getting towards the end of the novel, and it needs to show up some place. Also, and probably more importantly, it comes up right before readers experience the story of the plane crash that did some damage to Billy's brain. I think it shows up now because it is the last clear memory that Billy has of the war. It is engrained on his brain. This was also part of the war that particularly stuck with Billy because this is where he was staying when the bombing took place. It is a place he will never forget because of the experience of the bombing of Dresden that he survived. This is the title of the novel because the novel is showing the devastation of World War II as well as elaborating on the effects such a war has on soldiers when they are done serving. This location is what Billy had on his mind most. It is where he was during that fateful bombing. It is the location he spat out as his address after the plane crash. This is where he truly experienced the horror and devastation of war.
This post will be a reaction. At the tail end of the sixth chapter appears the title of the novel. I think this is always a good thing to reflect upon. Why is it mentioned now? Why is this the title of the novel? I will now give my take on the two questions. I think that it is mentioned now because it is getting towards the end of the novel, and it needs to show up some place. Also, and probably more importantly, it comes up right before readers experience the story of the plane crash that did some damage to Billy's brain. I think it shows up now because it is the last clear memory that Billy has of the war. It is engrained on his brain. This was also part of the war that particularly stuck with Billy because this is where he was staying when the bombing took place. It is a place he will never forget because of the experience of the bombing of Dresden that he survived. This is the title of the novel because the novel is showing the devastation of World War II as well as elaborating on the effects such a war has on soldiers when they are done serving. This location is what Billy had on his mind most. It is where he was during that fateful bombing. It is the location he spat out as his address after the plane crash. This is where he truly experienced the horror and devastation of war.
Slaughterhouse-Five: 8
"It was about an Earthling man and woman who were kidnapped by extra-terrestrials. They were put on display in a zoo on a plane called Zircon-212." (201)
This quote shows paralellism in the novel. The event being paralleled is Billy's own time traveling experience. Billy is kidnapped and kept in a zoo on the planet Tralfamadore. Later, a woman, Montana Wildhack, is also transported to the planet. Both societies of extra-terrestrials are interested in watching the humans. Billy and Montana are constantly being observed to see how they react to certain things, how they interact with each other, how they reproduce, and basically how they live as humans. Similarly, the Zircon-212 creatures watch the humans to see how they react to playing the stock market. Both circumstances seem strange. I am not sure of the significance of the parallel. The first thing that comes to my mind is that the author is showing us that Billy is putting himself into the novels he reads in the phsychiatric hospital because he doesn't want to live in his own life. Maybe Billy "time travels" to escape the present and who he really is because he doesn't want to remember the past. Billy puts himself into novel like plots and changes details because he would rather live that life than the one he did.
This quote shows paralellism in the novel. The event being paralleled is Billy's own time traveling experience. Billy is kidnapped and kept in a zoo on the planet Tralfamadore. Later, a woman, Montana Wildhack, is also transported to the planet. Both societies of extra-terrestrials are interested in watching the humans. Billy and Montana are constantly being observed to see how they react to certain things, how they interact with each other, how they reproduce, and basically how they live as humans. Similarly, the Zircon-212 creatures watch the humans to see how they react to playing the stock market. Both circumstances seem strange. I am not sure of the significance of the parallel. The first thing that comes to my mind is that the author is showing us that Billy is putting himself into the novels he reads in the phsychiatric hospital because he doesn't want to live in his own life. Maybe Billy "time travels" to escape the present and who he really is because he doesn't want to remember the past. Billy puts himself into novel like plots and changes details because he would rather live that life than the one he did.
Slaughterhouse-Five: 7
"You needn't worry about bombs, by the way. Dresden is an open city. It is undefended, and contains no war industries or troop concentrations of any importance." (146)
This quote is dramatic irony and an understatement all in one. There is irony in the fact that the Englishmen is telling the American soldiers leaving for Dresden that there is no need to worry for their safety from bombs. The audience knows from historical knowledge as well as from Billy's flashbacks that the city of Dresden does in fact get bombed. The purpose of this irony is to show readers the unsuspecting nature the Americans had while in Dresden. They did not have the slightest clue that a bomb would be dropped right over their heads. I think this also is a symbol for a war as a whole. The American soldiers and soldiers from other countries as well never knew what their enemy had planned. The whole idea of war is to catch the enemy off guard and kill their soldiers. I would think that no matter where in Europe the soldiers were, they should at least be conscious that there is a possibility that a bomb could be dropped on their heads. The understatement is that the Englishman goes on to say that there are no war industries or troops of importance. Apparently there was something of importance in Dresden or it would not have been bombed. I don't think that bombs were commodities that could be wasted on barren fields.
This quote is dramatic irony and an understatement all in one. There is irony in the fact that the Englishmen is telling the American soldiers leaving for Dresden that there is no need to worry for their safety from bombs. The audience knows from historical knowledge as well as from Billy's flashbacks that the city of Dresden does in fact get bombed. The purpose of this irony is to show readers the unsuspecting nature the Americans had while in Dresden. They did not have the slightest clue that a bomb would be dropped right over their heads. I think this also is a symbol for a war as a whole. The American soldiers and soldiers from other countries as well never knew what their enemy had planned. The whole idea of war is to catch the enemy off guard and kill their soldiers. I would think that no matter where in Europe the soldiers were, they should at least be conscious that there is a possibility that a bomb could be dropped on their heads. The understatement is that the Englishman goes on to say that there are no war industries or troops of importance. Apparently there was something of importance in Dresden or it would not have been bombed. I don't think that bombs were commodities that could be wasted on barren fields.
Slaughterhouse-Five: 6
"The boots fit perfectly. Billy Pilgrim was Cinderella, and Cinderella was Billy Pilgrim." (145)
This quote is a metaphor. Billy Pilgrim is not literally Cinderella. The metaphor is used to make a bigger comparison than the fact that Billy is wearing the boots that have been painted to be the glass slippers in the English soldiers' rendition of Cinderalla. I think the comparison that is being made here is that Billy Pilgrim has defied odds just as Cinderella did. Billy Pilgrim is the Cinderella story of World War II. He was not built to be a soldier. He doesn't have the discipline to be a soldier. But somehow, Billy Pilgrim lives through the war even when people much better off have become victims. I think this shows that Billy has some special purpose in life because he never loses even when all odds are stacked against him. What I don't get is why. Billy seems to luck into all his good fortune. He doesn't try particularly hard to stay alive, it just happens. It is like he is just a spectator in the war.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Slaughterhouse Five: 5
"Von der Kuppel der Frauenkirche sah ich diese leidigen Truemmer zwischen die schoene staedtische Ordnung hineingesaet; da ruehmte mir der Kuester die Kunst des Baumeisters, welcher Kirche und Kuppel auf einen so unerwuenschten Fall schon eingerichtet und bombenfest erbaut hatte." (18)
This is another reaction blog. What is the point of the German? I get that is was describing the ruins of Dresden after the bombings and devastation, but why is it in another language. I realize that it is Goete's language and he is the one who said this, but couldn't the author have translated it for the english-speaking audience. I mean, I take German and didn't even understand it all. I am sure that those who don't take german just skipped this paragraph because even if it were relevant, they wouldn't understand it. The German influences on the plot of the novel are immense which makes sense because that is the general setting of the war part of the novel. Also, the war part of the novel is the most prevalent because it is the general backbone of the story and what has led to everything else like the flashbacks and alien abductions.
This is another reaction blog. What is the point of the German? I get that is was describing the ruins of Dresden after the bombings and devastation, but why is it in another language. I realize that it is Goete's language and he is the one who said this, but couldn't the author have translated it for the english-speaking audience. I mean, I take German and didn't even understand it all. I am sure that those who don't take german just skipped this paragraph because even if it were relevant, they wouldn't understand it. The German influences on the plot of the novel are immense which makes sense because that is the general setting of the war part of the novel. Also, the war part of the novel is the most prevalent because it is the general backbone of the story and what has led to everything else like the flashbacks and alien abductions.
Slaughterhouse Five: 4
"The Englishmen had known for twelve hours that the Americans were on their way. They had never had guests before, and they went to work like darling elves, sweeping, mopping, cooking, baking- making mattresses of straw and burlap bags, setting tabels, putting party favors at each place." (95)
The part of the novel about the Englishmen really surprised me. I was not aware of the Germans being nice to anyone in the war, but apparently they nearly worshipped these men. The life that the English prisoners are living is in sharp contrast to all other POWs who are hardly fed, kept in train cars because of lack of room, and have no supplies and bad clothes and shoes. It seems as though these people were better off than the german soldiers and guards which doesn't really make sense. Also, it seems as though these Englishmen are having a good time as prisoners. They eat lovely meals because they have large stashes of supplies and food. They have plays and feasts because they can. They act as if they aren't prisoners of war. Although this is puzzling for me, it may have been to their benefit. Obviously the soldiers kept them around because of there massive connections to food that was becoming scarce. Without a chance at being killed, it makes sense that they would just live wall wihtout a care in the world because if they worried about what was going on elsewhere or even within their own camp, they may be devastated by war.
The part of the novel about the Englishmen really surprised me. I was not aware of the Germans being nice to anyone in the war, but apparently they nearly worshipped these men. The life that the English prisoners are living is in sharp contrast to all other POWs who are hardly fed, kept in train cars because of lack of room, and have no supplies and bad clothes and shoes. It seems as though these people were better off than the german soldiers and guards which doesn't really make sense. Also, it seems as though these Englishmen are having a good time as prisoners. They eat lovely meals because they have large stashes of supplies and food. They have plays and feasts because they can. They act as if they aren't prisoners of war. Although this is puzzling for me, it may have been to their benefit. Obviously the soldiers kept them around because of there massive connections to food that was becoming scarce. Without a chance at being killed, it makes sense that they would just live wall wihtout a care in the world because if they worried about what was going on elsewhere or even within their own camp, they may be devastated by war.
Slaughterhouse Five: 3
"And then Billy was a middle-aged optometrist again, playing hacker's golf this time - on a blazing summer Sunday morning." (85)
This quote is one example of a flashback. Throughout the book, Billy Pilgrim has flashbacked to many different parts of his life. He flashes back to the war, his childhood, his adulthood, and his trips to Tralfamadore. These flashbacks are constantly coming and going from one to the other. At first this was confusing, but it has gotten easier to keep things straight. I think the purpose of the flashbacks is to show how bad the war really was. Also, it shows the effects of war on a person simultaneously. I think this makes it easier to relate the two. I think the flashbacks are also effective because it shows the view of war after the fact and not during the war when emotions are high during actual combat. It also shows more of an accurate depiction of war's effect on people.
This quote is one example of a flashback. Throughout the book, Billy Pilgrim has flashbacked to many different parts of his life. He flashes back to the war, his childhood, his adulthood, and his trips to Tralfamadore. These flashbacks are constantly coming and going from one to the other. At first this was confusing, but it has gotten easier to keep things straight. I think the purpose of the flashbacks is to show how bad the war really was. Also, it shows the effects of war on a person simultaneously. I think this makes it easier to relate the two. I think the flashbacks are also effective because it shows the view of war after the fact and not during the war when emotions are high during actual combat. It also shows more of an accurate depiction of war's effect on people.
Slaughterhouse Five: 2
"All time is all time. It does not change. It does not lend itself to warnings or explanations. It simply is. Take it moment by moment, and you will find that we are all, as I've said before, bugs in amber." (86)
This quote contains what I believe to be one of the themes of the novel. At this point, I believe that each of the three different settings (war, Tralfamadore, and Billy's hometown) have their own unique themes. This theme was a very direct presentation. Usually I find myself searching for themes, but this one just jumped out at me. I think that this is effective, especially that it was revealed so early in the novel because now I can have it in mind during future trips to Tralfamadore. I think that this is theme means that humans need to be more observant of the current moment rather than constantly looking toward the future or for a deeper meaning. Sometimes we look too much into things and forget to take into consideration that sometimes things just are. I think that especially in times of war we look forward to the end and miss a great deal of what happens now. I think that we just need to let life happen and accept that we are bugs in amber and cannot control everything.
This quote contains what I believe to be one of the themes of the novel. At this point, I believe that each of the three different settings (war, Tralfamadore, and Billy's hometown) have their own unique themes. This theme was a very direct presentation. Usually I find myself searching for themes, but this one just jumped out at me. I think that this is effective, especially that it was revealed so early in the novel because now I can have it in mind during future trips to Tralfamadore. I think that this is theme means that humans need to be more observant of the current moment rather than constantly looking toward the future or for a deeper meaning. Sometimes we look too much into things and forget to take into consideration that sometimes things just are. I think that especially in times of war we look forward to the end and miss a great deal of what happens now. I think that we just need to let life happen and accept that we are bugs in amber and cannot control everything.
Slaughterhouse Five: 1
"After poor Edgar Derby, the high school teacher, was shot in Dresden later on, a doctor pronounced him dead and snapped his dogtag in two. So it goes." (92)
I am going to start by saying that I am not a fan of this new look of Blogger. However, I do like that spell check is now an option. Anyways, in this blog, I will be expressing the motif that is prevalent throughout the novel. Every time someone dies or a story telling of a person dying, it is followed by "So it goes." At first I was a bit annoyed by this recurrence, but I think I understand why it must be that way. The purpose of this motif is to show the effects of war. When someone goes to war, a place where death is an everyday occurrence, one must understand that this is how it is in war. It is the narrators way of saying that death happens, especially in war. People must be able to look beyond death and dismiss it. If one is not hung up over every single death, he is more likely to live through the war. It is effective because it shows one of the many effects of war and how it affects the individuals involved in the horrible experience of war.
I am going to start by saying that I am not a fan of this new look of Blogger. However, I do like that spell check is now an option. Anyways, in this blog, I will be expressing the motif that is prevalent throughout the novel. Every time someone dies or a story telling of a person dying, it is followed by "So it goes." At first I was a bit annoyed by this recurrence, but I think I understand why it must be that way. The purpose of this motif is to show the effects of war. When someone goes to war, a place where death is an everyday occurrence, one must understand that this is how it is in war. It is the narrators way of saying that death happens, especially in war. People must be able to look beyond death and dismiss it. If one is not hung up over every single death, he is more likely to live through the war. It is effective because it shows one of the many effects of war and how it affects the individuals involved in the horrible experience of war.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Frankenstein: 10
"Are you mad, my friend? said he; or whither does your senseless curiosity lead you? Would you also create for yourself and the world a demoniacal enemy? Peace, Peace! learn my miseries, and do not seek to increase your own."
This quote is Victor telling Walton why he won't tell him details of the creation process. I think this is a good thing because his action ruined his life and made him miserable. It also killed four people. No one should ever know how he did what he did because it was a danger to all people. Walton even wants to know the details after the story even though Victor told him at the beginning that no one should know what he does. I think Walton is crazy for even yearning for the knowledge that made Victor so miserable for so long. However, I am impressed that Victor was able to create life. To me, that is very impressive, but apparently it is dangerous and uncontrollable. I think it is good that Victor died as the sole person with the knowledge to create life because based on his experiences, it should never be done again.
This quote is Victor telling Walton why he won't tell him details of the creation process. I think this is a good thing because his action ruined his life and made him miserable. It also killed four people. No one should ever know how he did what he did because it was a danger to all people. Walton even wants to know the details after the story even though Victor told him at the beginning that no one should know what he does. I think Walton is crazy for even yearning for the knowledge that made Victor so miserable for so long. However, I am impressed that Victor was able to create life. To me, that is very impressive, but apparently it is dangerous and uncontrollable. I think it is good that Victor died as the sole person with the knowledge to create life because based on his experiences, it should never be done again.
Frankenstein: 9
"I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and trembling with passion, tore to pieces the thing on which I was engaged."
In this quote, Victor destroys the female creature he had been working to create. I totally support Victor on this decision. There are so many things that could go wrong by creating another creature. The new female may not agree to the same peaceful pact as her male counterpart. She may not like the creature which would be even worse for him than being rejected by humans. They may create creature babies which could take over the earth. Any of these things would probably kill Victor seeing as how he is so miserable by just one unhappy creature of his own hands. I think this is also a good decision for the rest of the world because now they will not be tortured by two monsters if something goes wrong. However, I feel bad for the creature because he really wanted someone to accept him. I think he truly believed that he could just escape with the female and be of no bother to anyone, but he failed to see the other disastrous possibilities.
In this quote, Victor destroys the female creature he had been working to create. I totally support Victor on this decision. There are so many things that could go wrong by creating another creature. The new female may not agree to the same peaceful pact as her male counterpart. She may not like the creature which would be even worse for him than being rejected by humans. They may create creature babies which could take over the earth. Any of these things would probably kill Victor seeing as how he is so miserable by just one unhappy creature of his own hands. I think this is also a good decision for the rest of the world because now they will not be tortured by two monsters if something goes wrong. However, I feel bad for the creature because he really wanted someone to accept him. I think he truly believed that he could just escape with the female and be of no bother to anyone, but he failed to see the other disastrous possibilities.
Frankenstein: 8
"I can hardly describe to you the effect of these books. They produced in me an infinity of new images and feelings, that sometimes raised me to ecstasty, but more frequently sunck me into the lowest dejection." (page 91)
Another them of Frankenstein is education/knowledge. The creature is a very quick learner. We experience this when he is able to learn an entire language with reading and writing through a slit in the wall of his hovel. To me, this is incredible. He begins to read a great deal and learns about past civilizations. He is incredibly horrified at the cruelty of man. He doesn't understand how they could kill their own kind or themselves. This is ironic and a bit hyocritical because he will eventually embark on a killing spree of his own. Back to the education theme, the creature learns very fast especially since his is indirectly being taught rather than relying on observations of his own. The knowledge the creature gets from his readings affects him in different ways. He learned history stories of gloom. He was able to relate well to many of the books. He related to the Native Americans in Ruins of Empires becasue they were judged to be savage by their appearance. He relates to Sorrows of Werter, but he is not exactly sure why. He related to Paradise Lost because he is similar to Adam in that he is united by no link to any other being in existence. However, he relates more to the devil in this story because he is envious.
Another them of Frankenstein is education/knowledge. The creature is a very quick learner. We experience this when he is able to learn an entire language with reading and writing through a slit in the wall of his hovel. To me, this is incredible. He begins to read a great deal and learns about past civilizations. He is incredibly horrified at the cruelty of man. He doesn't understand how they could kill their own kind or themselves. This is ironic and a bit hyocritical because he will eventually embark on a killing spree of his own. Back to the education theme, the creature learns very fast especially since his is indirectly being taught rather than relying on observations of his own. The knowledge the creature gets from his readings affects him in different ways. He learned history stories of gloom. He was able to relate well to many of the books. He related to the Native Americans in Ruins of Empires becasue they were judged to be savage by their appearance. He relates to Sorrows of Werter, but he is not exactly sure why. He related to Paradise Lost because he is similar to Adam in that he is united by no link to any other being in existence. However, he relates more to the devil in this story because he is envious.
Frankenstein: 7
"During these last days I have been occupied in examining my past conduct; nor do I find it blameable." (page 161)
A theme of the novel is destiny. In the beginning of the novel (page 23), Victor states that "destiny was too potent and her immutable laws had decreed [his] utter and terrible destruction." Victor is a strong believer of the power of destiny as described above. In the end of the book, he does not blame himself for what has happened. He blames it on destiny and his lack of control on his destiny. He says that he created a rational creature and did everything he could to make him happy. It was his duty to create the creature , but in the end, his duties to his own species had greater claims to his attention because they included a greater proportion of happiness or misery. He claims that he had to create the creature to fulfill his destiny. He did what he could to satisfy him, but in the end even his best efforts could not make the creature happy. He also says that it is not his fault that his family and friends and making them happy was more important than making the creature happy because his happiness or misery was directly related to his family life. I think it is crazy that he doesn't blame what has happened on himself because he was the sole creator whether it was his destiny or not.
A theme of the novel is destiny. In the beginning of the novel (page 23), Victor states that "destiny was too potent and her immutable laws had decreed [his] utter and terrible destruction." Victor is a strong believer of the power of destiny as described above. In the end of the book, he does not blame himself for what has happened. He blames it on destiny and his lack of control on his destiny. He says that he created a rational creature and did everything he could to make him happy. It was his duty to create the creature , but in the end, his duties to his own species had greater claims to his attention because they included a greater proportion of happiness or misery. He claims that he had to create the creature to fulfill his destiny. He did what he could to satisfy him, but in the end even his best efforts could not make the creature happy. He also says that it is not his fault that his family and friends and making them happy was more important than making the creature happy because his happiness or misery was directly related to his family life. I think it is crazy that he doesn't blame what has happened on himself because he was the sole creator whether it was his destiny or not.
Frankenstein: 6
"You have read this strange and terrific story, Margaret; and do you not feel your blood congeal with horror, like that which evne now curdles mine?" (page 155)
Frankenstein is an example of a frame story. There are multiple levels of story within a story. The first level of the story is letters from Robert Walton to his sister, Margaret Saville. The next tear of the frame story is Victor telling his story to Robert Walton. Walton is telling his sister of the time with Victor Frankenstein and the story he related to him. Also, within Victor's story is another level of the frame. The creature also tells a story in Victor's story that is being written to Margaret from Walton. The frame story is important to the novel becuase it allows readers to understand that the information being relayed is accurate. It also shifts sympathies of readers when the same events are told with different insights from different perspectives. Shelley uses the frame story well by doubling scenes and describing them from the perspective of the creature and Victor.
Frankenstein is an example of a frame story. There are multiple levels of story within a story. The first level of the story is letters from Robert Walton to his sister, Margaret Saville. The next tear of the frame story is Victor telling his story to Robert Walton. Walton is telling his sister of the time with Victor Frankenstein and the story he related to him. Also, within Victor's story is another level of the frame. The creature also tells a story in Victor's story that is being written to Margaret from Walton. The frame story is important to the novel becuase it allows readers to understand that the information being relayed is accurate. It also shifts sympathies of readers when the same events are told with different insights from different perspectives. Shelley uses the frame story well by doubling scenes and describing them from the perspective of the creature and Victor.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Frankenstein: 5
"I was their plaything and their idol, and something better-their child, the innocent and helpless creature bestowed on them by Heaven, whom to bring up to good, and whose future lot it was in their hands to direct to happiness or misery, according as they fulfilled their duties towards me." (page 16)
For this blog, I am going to be discussing the family dynamics of the Frankensteins. I am going to start with a bit of confusion. Victor's father was said to be named Beaufort in chapter 1. However on page 47, Alphonse Frankenstein signed a letter as his affectionate and afflicted father. I am pretty sure that Caroline was Victor's mother. He was the oldest of three boys: Victor, Ernest, and William. Elizabeth was an adopted "cousin" and lover of Frankensteins. Also, Justine Moritz was an adopted sister. All of these people deeply cared for each other. They loved each other and spent a great deal of time caring for each other, especially in times of illness. This shows that all of these people are genuinely good people and want to help people. Also, their readiness and willingness to let people in is reflective of their good nature. Also, their devastation at loss is reflective of how much they mean to each other.
For this blog, I am going to be discussing the family dynamics of the Frankensteins. I am going to start with a bit of confusion. Victor's father was said to be named Beaufort in chapter 1. However on page 47, Alphonse Frankenstein signed a letter as his affectionate and afflicted father. I am pretty sure that Caroline was Victor's mother. He was the oldest of three boys: Victor, Ernest, and William. Elizabeth was an adopted "cousin" and lover of Frankensteins. Also, Justine Moritz was an adopted sister. All of these people deeply cared for each other. They loved each other and spent a great deal of time caring for each other, especially in times of illness. This shows that all of these people are genuinely good people and want to help people. Also, their readiness and willingness to let people in is reflective of their good nature. Also, their devastation at loss is reflective of how much they mean to each other.
Frankenstein: 4
"the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart" (page 35)
I think that it is a bit ironic Victor Frankenstein is so consumed in his task of creating life, but is immediately horrified by his work upon his success. Victor put many years and countless hours into his work. He was very devoted to his work especially as he was nearing the end. He became entirely consumed by his goal for a great deal of time. He researched and took a path all his own while going where no scientist had gone before. He was on the verge of scientific breakthrough. As soon as the creature's eyes opened and the creature began breathing, Victor immediately regretted his work. He knew he made a mistake and ran away from the creature. It is ironic that the work that had been his life for so many years was finally a success, but he was disgusted and could not stand to be near it. It is ironic that he switched so quickly from hope to hate. It makes me question what he thought would happen with his creation. Things happened exactly how he had planned, so I am curious as to what he expected. It is weird that he so quickly knew that he made a mistake.
I think that it is a bit ironic Victor Frankenstein is so consumed in his task of creating life, but is immediately horrified by his work upon his success. Victor put many years and countless hours into his work. He was very devoted to his work especially as he was nearing the end. He became entirely consumed by his goal for a great deal of time. He researched and took a path all his own while going where no scientist had gone before. He was on the verge of scientific breakthrough. As soon as the creature's eyes opened and the creature began breathing, Victor immediately regretted his work. He knew he made a mistake and ran away from the creature. It is ironic that the work that had been his life for so many years was finally a success, but he was disgusted and could not stand to be near it. It is ironic that he switched so quickly from hope to hate. It makes me question what he thought would happen with his creation. Things happened exactly how he had planned, so I am curious as to what he expected. It is weird that he so quickly knew that he made a mistake.
Frankenstein: 3
"I hardly placed my foot within the door before the children shrieked, and one of the women fainted. The whole village was roused; some fled, some attacked me, until, grievously bruised by stones and many other kinds of missile weapons." (page 74)
This quote demonstrates the external conflict between the creature and society. He clearly does not fit in with society because of his large stature. He also lacked communication skills because he was left to figure everything out himself. Basically I picture him as a ver large baby because of his lack of intelligence for the beginning of his life. He does not fit into society because he is not like everyone else. The conflict between society and this new, large being is evident because he is feared and not excepted. The purpose of the conflict is to further exaggerate the horror and distaste that Victor has towards the creature. It shows that the creature really isn't human like and it implies that he does not fit in society and is unable to function in cohesion with society. The external conflict between the creature and society is effective because it shows that the creature does not get along well with the current society. It supports Victor's fear of the horrible potential of the monster he created.
This quote demonstrates the external conflict between the creature and society. He clearly does not fit in with society because of his large stature. He also lacked communication skills because he was left to figure everything out himself. Basically I picture him as a ver large baby because of his lack of intelligence for the beginning of his life. He does not fit into society because he is not like everyone else. The conflict between society and this new, large being is evident because he is feared and not excepted. The purpose of the conflict is to further exaggerate the horror and distaste that Victor has towards the creature. It shows that the creature really isn't human like and it implies that he does not fit in society and is unable to function in cohesion with society. The external conflict between the creature and society is effective because it shows that the creature does not get along well with the current society. It supports Victor's fear of the horrible potential of the monster he created.
Frankenstein: 2
"She appeared to me the most amiable and benevolent of human creatures." (page 56)
This quote is an example of indirect characterization. Readers never really meet Justine Moritz. We learn about her through the characters response to her and their opinions of her. We learn of her past and her experiences through recounts by other characters. I think the author does this to avoid directly stating what she is like. This allows readers to make their own judgements on her character just as the judges do when she is put on trial for murder. I think the indirect characterization is affective because readers must determine her character based solely on what others see in her. Also, it is affective because it is well used by providing many differenct accounts of her character that all lead readers to similar conclusion. These accounts are from different people, yet the same conclusions that she is a selfless, loving person can be drawn.
This quote is an example of indirect characterization. Readers never really meet Justine Moritz. We learn about her through the characters response to her and their opinions of her. We learn of her past and her experiences through recounts by other characters. I think the author does this to avoid directly stating what she is like. This allows readers to make their own judgements on her character just as the judges do when she is put on trial for murder. I think the indirect characterization is affective because readers must determine her character based solely on what others see in her. Also, it is affective because it is well used by providing many differenct accounts of her character that all lead readers to similar conclusion. These accounts are from different people, yet the same conclusions that she is a selfless, loving person can be drawn.
Frankenstein: 1
"It is with considerable difficulty that I remember the original era of my being: all the events of that period appear confused and indistinct." (page 70)
First of all, this is the 100th blog of this AP Lit class which I feel merits some sort of celebration. For that reason I will now say "Happy 100th blog, everyone. We have now reached triple digits." Back on topic, this above quote begins a two chapter long (and quite possibly longer, but we have not read to that point yet) flashback by the creature. The flashback is very important to the development of the plot, because it fills readers in on the past few years from the creature's perspective. (I am now debating of whether or not the C in creature should be capitalized because it is acting as his name for now.) The flashback lets the readers and Victor know what the creature has been up to from the time of the creation to the point when Victor meets up with the creature after William's murder. The point of the flashback inserted directly after the two years have happened in Victor's life is significant. I feel like their is some significance realted to the fact that Shelley placed it here. I noticed some correlations between Victor's happenings and attitudes and the creature's. The flashback is significant because we are given the creature's perspective of what has happened rather than readers only having Victor's horror.
First of all, this is the 100th blog of this AP Lit class which I feel merits some sort of celebration. For that reason I will now say "Happy 100th blog, everyone. We have now reached triple digits." Back on topic, this above quote begins a two chapter long (and quite possibly longer, but we have not read to that point yet) flashback by the creature. The flashback is very important to the development of the plot, because it fills readers in on the past few years from the creature's perspective. (I am now debating of whether or not the C in creature should be capitalized because it is acting as his name for now.) The flashback lets the readers and Victor know what the creature has been up to from the time of the creation to the point when Victor meets up with the creature after William's murder. The point of the flashback inserted directly after the two years have happened in Victor's life is significant. I feel like their is some significance realted to the fact that Shelley placed it here. I noticed some correlations between Victor's happenings and attitudes and the creature's. The flashback is significant because we are given the creature's perspective of what has happened rather than readers only having Victor's horror.
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
A Raisin in the Sun: 3
"Mama stands, at last alone in the living room, her plant on the table before her." (page 151)
For this blog, I will be addressing question number nine. I think that Mama feels trapped. She is trapped in the same old house as she has been for years. She is cramped with all of these people living under one roof because their previous financial situation has been less than ideal. She feels trapped because there has been no opportunity for her to escape to more freedom. One way she deals with this is always having hope for the future. She never seems negative about the situation and looks forward to the time when they will have a nicer home. Also, she has a plant in the tiny window they have in the apartment. This rejuvenates her sense of life because it is a reminder of what is outside. It is something that has promise and hope for the future just as she does. In addition, in the end, she escapes being trapped by making the executive decision to buy a bigger house for her family. She doesn't want to lose anything with the move. Instead, she hopes to gain and make progress toward freedom for her family and race. She feels like she is stuck in the status quo and she is dying to break free and live where she wants and do what she wants. She escapes the status quo by buying the house and not caving when things looked difficult. She stuck to her hope and dream of a better life.
For this blog, I will be addressing question number nine. I think that Mama feels trapped. She is trapped in the same old house as she has been for years. She is cramped with all of these people living under one roof because their previous financial situation has been less than ideal. She feels trapped because there has been no opportunity for her to escape to more freedom. One way she deals with this is always having hope for the future. She never seems negative about the situation and looks forward to the time when they will have a nicer home. Also, she has a plant in the tiny window they have in the apartment. This rejuvenates her sense of life because it is a reminder of what is outside. It is something that has promise and hope for the future just as she does. In addition, in the end, she escapes being trapped by making the executive decision to buy a bigger house for her family. She doesn't want to lose anything with the move. Instead, she hopes to gain and make progress toward freedom for her family and race. She feels like she is stuck in the status quo and she is dying to break free and live where she wants and do what she wants. She escapes the status quo by buying the house and not caving when things looked difficult. She stuck to her hope and dream of a better life.
A Raisin in the Sun: 2
"No. Travis, you stay right here. And you make him understand what you doing, Walter Lee." (page 147)
For this blog I will be addressing question number 7. I think that the trivial conversation was when Mama told Walter that whatever he had to say to Mr. Lindner must be said in front of Travis. To many this would not seem like a big deal. However, this conversation was supposed to be about giving up on a wonderful thing for the family just to take a risk with the rewards. I think that this conversation had a lasting impact on Walter because he realized that he was to proud to back down from the white folks, especially in front of his son. In the beginning, Walter was to proud to tell Travis that he didn't have the extra fifty cents to spare. I think that this conversation reiterated to Walter the importance of pride and going after what you want in life even when it is met with strife. I think that really hit home in Walter that he had to to what was best for his family because they were counting on him like children count on their parents to provide for them. I think that Walter realized that his family meant more to him than the prospect of a successful business. Walter learned from this conversation that his son is looking up to him and doesn't want his dad to disappoint him.
For this blog I will be addressing question number 7. I think that the trivial conversation was when Mama told Walter that whatever he had to say to Mr. Lindner must be said in front of Travis. To many this would not seem like a big deal. However, this conversation was supposed to be about giving up on a wonderful thing for the family just to take a risk with the rewards. I think that this conversation had a lasting impact on Walter because he realized that he was to proud to back down from the white folks, especially in front of his son. In the beginning, Walter was to proud to tell Travis that he didn't have the extra fifty cents to spare. I think that this conversation reiterated to Walter the importance of pride and going after what you want in life even when it is met with strife. I think that really hit home in Walter that he had to to what was best for his family because they were counting on him like children count on their parents to provide for them. I think that Walter realized that his family meant more to him than the prospect of a successful business. Walter learned from this conversation that his son is looking up to him and doesn't want his dad to disappoint him.
A Raisin in the Sun: 1
"She went out and she bought a house." (page 91)
For this blog, I will be addressing question number three on the handout. One person that makes things happen in A Raisin in the Sun is Mama. She is the driving force behind the action in the play. She does not merely talk about doing things. Rather, she goes out and does what she needs to do. This is exemplified in the above quote because she did what she thought was best for the family without their input. She is the head of the family for the majority of the book, and everyone looks to her to know what to do even if they don't admit it. Ruth is the character who watches things happen. She is not very involved in the family. This may have something to do with the fact that she in not blood related to the other adults in the play. This feeling of disconnect leads Ruth to just observe what is going on around her. An example of this is when everyone has their own plan for the insurance money besides Ruth who just listens to everyone else's plans. The character who wonders what happens in Walter. He is also kind of disconnected because he leaves to go drink when things get heated in the family. I also think that he wonders what happens because he doesn't pay attention to anyone else besides himself. This leaves him in disbelief when people do certain things even though they have been talked about for a while.
For this blog, I will be addressing question number three on the handout. One person that makes things happen in A Raisin in the Sun is Mama. She is the driving force behind the action in the play. She does not merely talk about doing things. Rather, she goes out and does what she needs to do. This is exemplified in the above quote because she did what she thought was best for the family without their input. She is the head of the family for the majority of the book, and everyone looks to her to know what to do even if they don't admit it. Ruth is the character who watches things happen. She is not very involved in the family. This may have something to do with the fact that she in not blood related to the other adults in the play. This feeling of disconnect leads Ruth to just observe what is going on around her. An example of this is when everyone has their own plan for the insurance money besides Ruth who just listens to everyone else's plans. The character who wonders what happens in Walter. He is also kind of disconnected because he leaves to go drink when things get heated in the family. I also think that he wonders what happens because he doesn't pay attention to anyone else besides himself. This leaves him in disbelief when people do certain things even though they have been talked about for a while.
Monday, February 27, 2012
The Glass Menagerie-3
''Somebody needs to build your confidence up and make you proud instead off shy andd turning away and- blushing- Somebody- ought to- ought to- kiss you.'' (jpage 1283-1284, scene 7)
I think that Jim saw a bit off his old self in Laura. He had gone through a similar thing and knew what she was going through. He wanted too make her feel special and build up her confidence. He would have majorly failed if he had said that he was engaged upon first arriving. I think that he needed to tell Laura about Betty because he didn't want to get her hopes up and then crutch them and her self confidence when he didn't call. I think for a while Jim got caught up in the moment and felt special in Laura's presence too. He had to tell Laura about Betty as much as he needed to remind himself. He loved Betty and needed to be faithful to her. I think that Jim saw the need to help Laura and the only way he knew how was treating her like a normal person. I think that even the short time with Jim reminded Laura of what she could be. I think he helped her gain a bit of confidence and brought her out of her shy nature. Jim treated Laura very well also because he is a gentleman and that is what he does. He seems to be a kind and driven man that is willing to help people when they need it. I think Jim figured out early on the reason for his invitation to dinner, but he took it by the horns and ran with it. He really helped the family even if it wasn't in the way they were expecting.
I think that Jim saw a bit off his old self in Laura. He had gone through a similar thing and knew what she was going through. He wanted too make her feel special and build up her confidence. He would have majorly failed if he had said that he was engaged upon first arriving. I think that he needed to tell Laura about Betty because he didn't want to get her hopes up and then crutch them and her self confidence when he didn't call. I think for a while Jim got caught up in the moment and felt special in Laura's presence too. He had to tell Laura about Betty as much as he needed to remind himself. He loved Betty and needed to be faithful to her. I think that Jim saw the need to help Laura and the only way he knew how was treating her like a normal person. I think that even the short time with Jim reminded Laura of what she could be. I think he helped her gain a bit of confidence and brought her out of her shy nature. Jim treated Laura very well also because he is a gentleman and that is what he does. He seems to be a kind and driven man that is willing to help people when they need it. I think Jim figured out early on the reason for his invitation to dinner, but he took it by the horns and ran with it. He really helped the family even if it wasn't in the way they were expecting.
The Glass Menagerie-2
''Why, listen, if self is what I thought of, Mother, I'd be where he is--GONE!'' (page 1247, scene 3)
In this quote, Tom is explaining to his mother that he is in fact not selfish. He pays the rent and all of the bills for his mother and sister because his father left. Tom has a dilemma the entire play. This dilemma is whether or not to leave. He quarrels with his mother because he treats him like he is a young child, but he is a grown adult providing for his family. His mother wants more out of him, but he can't offer more while taking care of them. He believes that he can do whatever he wants with his money and time as long as the bills get paid. Mother wants to keep him on a shorter leash. He sometimes needs a break from his lliffe. He feels bad for Laura and her condition, so he does everything he can for her. He wants her to succeed, but he is not as pushy as Mother when it comes to getting married and finding a job. He finally leaves because he is tired missing out on life and the world because he is couped up in his house with a job as a factory worker. He followed his father's footsteps and went in search of adventure. I believe that he does resolve his dilemma because he finally takes his life into his own hands. He is no longer waiting around for something good to happen. He left and is now taking an active role in making something happen.
In this quote, Tom is explaining to his mother that he is in fact not selfish. He pays the rent and all of the bills for his mother and sister because his father left. Tom has a dilemma the entire play. This dilemma is whether or not to leave. He quarrels with his mother because he treats him like he is a young child, but he is a grown adult providing for his family. His mother wants more out of him, but he can't offer more while taking care of them. He believes that he can do whatever he wants with his money and time as long as the bills get paid. Mother wants to keep him on a shorter leash. He sometimes needs a break from his lliffe. He feels bad for Laura and her condition, so he does everything he can for her. He wants her to succeed, but he is not as pushy as Mother when it comes to getting married and finding a job. He finally leaves because he is tired missing out on life and the world because he is couped up in his house with a job as a factory worker. He followed his father's footsteps and went in search of adventure. I believe that he does resolve his dilemma because he finally takes his life into his own hands. He is no longer waiting around for something good to happen. He left and is now taking an active role in making something happen.
The Glass Menagerie-1
''You know what I judge to be the trouble with you?'' Inferiority complex! Know what that is? That's what they call it when someone low-rates himself!'' (page 1279, scene 7)
In this quote Jim is telling Laura what he sees in her. He sees a girl with no confidence in herself or her abilities. The symptoms of her mental condition seem to be no confidence and a shy disposition. I think that most can be traced to her physical handicap, but it is not solely blaim. I think her unsureness of herself made her seclude herself from others since an early age. Because of this, she has no friends which probably furthers here mental condition. Also, her total lack of success may also be a contributing factor considering she failed out of high school and community college. Laura never leaves the house, so she never has a chance to be outgoing or sure of herself. I think that her condition has worsened after years of being cooped up in her house with her mother and brother for so many years. She is a sympathetic character because readers feel bad for her condition. We feel sorry for the fact that she is physically and mentally handicapped. She also gives a sense of being helpless which makes readers sympathize with her. Her relationship with her mother is much better than Tom's relationship with their mother. She respects her mother and is not bothered by her. However, her relationship is similar to Tom's in that they both lie to her about their whereabouts to avoid disappointing her
In this quote Jim is telling Laura what he sees in her. He sees a girl with no confidence in herself or her abilities. The symptoms of her mental condition seem to be no confidence and a shy disposition. I think that most can be traced to her physical handicap, but it is not solely blaim. I think her unsureness of herself made her seclude herself from others since an early age. Because of this, she has no friends which probably furthers here mental condition. Also, her total lack of success may also be a contributing factor considering she failed out of high school and community college. Laura never leaves the house, so she never has a chance to be outgoing or sure of herself. I think that her condition has worsened after years of being cooped up in her house with her mother and brother for so many years. She is a sympathetic character because readers feel bad for her condition. We feel sorry for the fact that she is physically and mentally handicapped. She also gives a sense of being helpless which makes readers sympathize with her. Her relationship with her mother is much better than Tom's relationship with their mother. She respects her mother and is not bothered by her. However, her relationship is similar to Tom's in that they both lie to her about their whereabouts to avoid disappointing her
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
As You Like It: 3
"Neither call the giddiness of it in question, the poverty of her, the small acquaintance, my sudden wooing, nor her sudden consenting, but say with me, I love Aliena."
Love at first site seems to be the way to go in this world. People see each other and fall into an obsessive and overdramatic love. I personally think this is crazy and do not believe in love at first sight. Quoting When in Rome, "That's not even long enough for a credit check." In the end, there are going to be four marriages on one day. Rosalind to Orlando, Oliver to Celia, Phebe to Silvius, and Touchstone to Audrey. That is crazy! Everyone is moving way to fast. Thanks to Mr. Costello, I understand that this is how it is in comedies, but it is a bit unrealistic. I think that all of these people are merely infatuated. Maybe all of the fresh air is messing with the heads of all of the city people. Anyways, the love at first sight gets a bit annoying especially when reading it on Valentine's day. Oh well, I prefer this gooey love stuff over the death in Othello.
Love at first site seems to be the way to go in this world. People see each other and fall into an obsessive and overdramatic love. I personally think this is crazy and do not believe in love at first sight. Quoting When in Rome, "That's not even long enough for a credit check." In the end, there are going to be four marriages on one day. Rosalind to Orlando, Oliver to Celia, Phebe to Silvius, and Touchstone to Audrey. That is crazy! Everyone is moving way to fast. Thanks to Mr. Costello, I understand that this is how it is in comedies, but it is a bit unrealistic. I think that all of these people are merely infatuated. Maybe all of the fresh air is messing with the heads of all of the city people. Anyways, the love at first sight gets a bit annoying especially when reading it on Valentine's day. Oh well, I prefer this gooey love stuff over the death in Othello.
As You Like It: 2
"Was 't you that did so oft contrive to kill him?"
" 'T was I"
"Who gave me fresh array and entertainment, committing me unto my brother's love." (Page 65, IV, iii)
These quotes demonstrate Oliver as a dynamic character. At the beginning of the play, Oliver wanted his brother Orlando dead. He also was not treating his brother according to his late father's wishes. In Act IV, Oliver is involved in a situation that transforms him. Oliver is treatened by Duke Frederick and realizes that he doesn't like being treated the way he has been treating his brother. Oliver realizes that Orlando deserves to be treated better and not constantly fearing for his life. Later Orlando saves Oliver's life even though he has not always been nice to him. Oliver realizes the importance of his brother. Oliver transforms and starts treating Orlando with respect. He also helps him by delivering a message to Gandymede about why Orlando failed to return within two hours. This shows that Oliver is starting to care about his brother.
" 'T was I"
"Who gave me fresh array and entertainment, committing me unto my brother's love." (Page 65, IV, iii)
These quotes demonstrate Oliver as a dynamic character. At the beginning of the play, Oliver wanted his brother Orlando dead. He also was not treating his brother according to his late father's wishes. In Act IV, Oliver is involved in a situation that transforms him. Oliver is treatened by Duke Frederick and realizes that he doesn't like being treated the way he has been treating his brother. Oliver realizes that Orlando deserves to be treated better and not constantly fearing for his life. Later Orlando saves Oliver's life even though he has not always been nice to him. Oliver realizes the importance of his brother. Oliver transforms and starts treating Orlando with respect. He also helps him by delivering a message to Gandymede about why Orlando failed to return within two hours. This shows that Oliver is starting to care about his brother.
As You Like It: 1
"I'll have no worse a name than Jove's own page; and therefore look you call me Ganymede. But what will you be called?"
"Something that hath a reference to my state; no longer Celia, but Aliena." (Page 15, I, iii)
This quote is an example of dramatic irony. The audience knows that these are the disguises that Rosalind and Celia will be in for the majority of the remainder of the play. However, the characters are unaware of the disguises and treat them as third party people. The other characters act as if Rosalind and Celia are not present. This is especially evident when Gandymede offers to help Orlando with his love sickness with Rosalind. Since dramatic irony is present, readers are able to learn the characters feelings and intents more clearly because characters can speak freely. Dramatic irony is used to allow the reader understand the full picture of what is happening in the play. It also is useful because it creates a bit of suspense with the readers because they wonder when and under what circumstances they will be revealed. Te dramatic irony is effective because as readers we know what is really going on, but some characters are left in the dark.
"Something that hath a reference to my state; no longer Celia, but Aliena." (Page 15, I, iii)
This quote is an example of dramatic irony. The audience knows that these are the disguises that Rosalind and Celia will be in for the majority of the remainder of the play. However, the characters are unaware of the disguises and treat them as third party people. The other characters act as if Rosalind and Celia are not present. This is especially evident when Gandymede offers to help Orlando with his love sickness with Rosalind. Since dramatic irony is present, readers are able to learn the characters feelings and intents more clearly because characters can speak freely. Dramatic irony is used to allow the reader understand the full picture of what is happening in the play. It also is useful because it creates a bit of suspense with the readers because they wonder when and under what circumstances they will be revealed. Te dramatic irony is effective because as readers we know what is really going on, but some characters are left in the dark.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Reflective Essay-Othello
“Everywhere you look you can write a book on the trouble of a woman and a man” (Hayes). The tradition of marriage has been around for thousands of years. Unfortunately, unfaithful spouses and affairs have been around equally as long. Throughout history, affairs have proven to be a
source of distrust, ruined relationships, and death. It violates the sacredness of marriage and the promise of for better or for worse. Othello is full of allegations of affairs and unfaithfulness. Like many other pop culture and historical items, Othello shares the theme of marriage as a minor technicality in intimate relationships for some people. Two such items include the song “Who’s Cheatin’ Who” by Alan Jackson and the story of King Henry and his multiple wives. These examples show that this theme is timeless because it was applicable in the fifteen hundreds and is still applicable today.
The theme of not valuing marriage and viewing it as a minor technicality is also evident in King Henry VIII’s story. He had six wives in a period of thirty-eight years. Apparently, the commitment of marriage meant nothing to him. Henry attempted to remain devout to his first wife Catherine, but he had at least two mistresses throughout their marriage. However, he grew frustrated with the lack
of a male heir and insisted that their marriage was never consummated and thus void (Eakins). Like the men in Othello, Henry did not show much concern for the commitment he made in marriage. Similar to Othello, he got rid of the things that did not please him. He had the wives who did not produce him a son killed. The cruelty and lack of concern for the women he was supposed to love is especially evident in the story of his second wife, Queen Anne Boleyn.
“The Queen herself was arrested at Greenwich and was informed of the charges against her: adultery, incest and plotting to murder the King” (Eakins). Henry was not shy about ending the lives of those who did not please him. In the same way, Othello killed Desdemona because he believed that she was not being faithful and giving him the undivided attention he deserved. Both men were rash and selfish.
Eakins, Lara E. "The Six Wives of Henry VIII." Tudor History. Lara E. Eakins, June 2007. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. http://tudorhistory.org/wives/.
Hayes, Jerry. "Who's Cheatin' Who." Rec. 07 Apr. 1997. Who's Cheatin' Who. Alan Jackson. Keith Stegall, 1997. CD.
Perrine, Lawrence. "Othello." Perrine's Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense. Fort Worth. Harcourt College. 2002: 1361-462. Print.

The theme of marriage as a mere technicality is apparent throughout Othello. Allegations of infidelity are rampant in the entirety of the play. Iago suspects Othello of having an affair with Emilia (I, iii, 366-368). Othello
accuses Desdemona of having an affair with Cassio (V, iii, 210-211). Bianca is Cassio’s mistress (IV, i, 165). All of these actions and accusations show that these men do not value the sacredness of marriage. The men accuse their women of cheating when they in fact are no better. None of them think about how their actions will affect their spouse. Also, none of them valued the promise of marriage like they should. Emilia was always faithful to Iago, but he never treated her properly. He failed to recognize his responsibility as a husband to show love and integrity towards his wife. Likewise, Othello did not trust Desdemona as he should as a husband. He instead listened to Iago and killed his wife over supposed adultery. Othello killed the woman with whom he was madly in love only weeks ago. Desdemona had shown nothing besides faithfulness and dedication to Othello, yet he was very quick to label her as a whore and get rid of her. Othello disrespects Desdemona many times throughout the play. One such instant is when he compares her to “a closet lock and key of villainous secrets” (IV, ii, 22). He does not honor her with the trust she deserves. These actions show that neither Iago nor Othello truly cherish the value of marriage or believe in working thing out.




The theme of a disregard for the sacredness of marriage in the context of other intimate relationships is still widespread today. In media, this message is all too
prevalent. One song that elaborates on the prevalence of infidelity today is “Who’s Cheatin’ Who” by Alan Jackson. “Who's cheatin' who, who's being true who don't even care anymore” (Hayes). This lyric shows that cheating is so common and expected that many people do not really care how their actions are affecting others. According to this song, it does not matter if one is faithful anymore because everyone is cheating someone. Not only does this song elaborate that cheating is rampant, but it also idolizes it. “It makes you wonder who’s doing right with someone tonight and who’s car is parked next door” (Hayes). The line “who’s doing right” makes it seem like it is a good thing to cheat on one’s spouse. It gives the impression that cheating is something deserving in praise.

The behavior of cheating and violating the commitment of marriage has been widespread for centuries. This theme found in Shakespeare’s Othello is timeless as evidence from the past and present. Othello, King Henry VIII, and “Who’s Cheatin’ Who” all promote the act of disregarding the promises of fidelity involved with marriage. Married couples promise each other and the state to stay together and work out problems for life. Othello violates this promise by killing Desdemona over mere allegations. King Henry made no attempt to make any of his marriages last. Alan Jackson’s song promotes the act of cheating and disregards that in order to be cheating, one must be breaking the bond of a marriage. These three instances that contain the theme of viewing marriage as a mere technicality when involving oneself in other intimate relations promote this behavior throughout the centuries. The fact that this theme is so universal is not a good thing because a behavior like this should not be approved or advocated.
Works Cited
Eakins, Lara E. "The Six Wives of Henry VIII." Tudor History. Lara E. Eakins, June 2007. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. http://tudorhistory.org/wives/.
Hayes, Jerry. "Who's Cheatin' Who." Rec. 07 Apr. 1997. Who's Cheatin' Who. Alan Jackson. Keith Stegall, 1997. CD.
Perrine, Lawrence. "Othello." Perrine's Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense. Fort Worth. Harcourt College. 2002: 1361-462. Print.
Monday, February 6, 2012
Reflective Essay Warm-Up


Thursday, February 2, 2012
Plays: Othello 6
"A likely piece of work, that you should find it in your chamber and not know who left it there! This is some minx's token, and I must take out the work? There, give it your hobbyhorse. Wheresoever, you had it, I'll take out no work on't." Page 1432, Act IV, scene i, lines 143-146
This quote bring the hankerchief into the story. Throughout the work, the hankerchief is involved with the supposed affair. Everyone has their opinions as to who has it and how they have it. Othello sees it as proof of Desdemona's affair. Iago sees it as a tool to get things to happen the way he wants. The hankerchief is also the piece of the puzzle that helps Emilia piece together everything that has unfolded in Act V. Once Othello tells Emilia that Iago's hunch was proven with the handkerchief, she is able to make the connection that Iago planned everything out. I also think that the connection is a bit of a symbol of the whole scheme becuase it is present or mentioned with pretty much every step of Iago's plan. It is as if it is a way for us to keep up with what point in Iago's plan we are reading.
This quote bring the hankerchief into the story. Throughout the work, the hankerchief is involved with the supposed affair. Everyone has their opinions as to who has it and how they have it. Othello sees it as proof of Desdemona's affair. Iago sees it as a tool to get things to happen the way he wants. The hankerchief is also the piece of the puzzle that helps Emilia piece together everything that has unfolded in Act V. Once Othello tells Emilia that Iago's hunch was proven with the handkerchief, she is able to make the connection that Iago planned everything out. I also think that the connection is a bit of a symbol of the whole scheme becuase it is present or mentioned with pretty much every step of Iago's plan. It is as if it is a way for us to keep up with what point in Iago's plan we are reading.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Plays: Othello 5
"My friend, thy husband, honest, honest Iago." Page 1454, Act V, Scene ii, line 153
This line reveals what Iago's epithet has been the entire play. Iago is repeatedly referred to as honest. However, readers are aware of the fact that he is anything but honest. I think this epithet is ironic because Iago spends the entire time manipulating people for his own good. This epithet characterizes how Iago appears to the characters. This is important because it explains and justifies the actions that the characters take that the readers percieve as stupid. One of these actions is trusting Iago. The characters all seem to trust him to help them because he acts honest and genuinely concerned for them. I think this epithet also shows how manipulative Iago was because everyone called him honest. An epithet is a generally accepted adjective that describes the character, so it must have been a consensus that Iago was a good and honest man.
This line reveals what Iago's epithet has been the entire play. Iago is repeatedly referred to as honest. However, readers are aware of the fact that he is anything but honest. I think this epithet is ironic because Iago spends the entire time manipulating people for his own good. This epithet characterizes how Iago appears to the characters. This is important because it explains and justifies the actions that the characters take that the readers percieve as stupid. One of these actions is trusting Iago. The characters all seem to trust him to help them because he acts honest and genuinely concerned for them. I think this epithet also shows how manipulative Iago was because everyone called him honest. An epithet is a generally accepted adjective that describes the character, so it must have been a consensus that Iago was a good and honest man.
Plays: Othello 4
"Moor, she was chaste. She loved thee, cruel Moor, so come my soul to bliss as I speak true. So speaking as I think, I die, I die." Page 1457, Act V, scene II, lines 247-250
In the fifth act, readers are shown that Emilia is a dynamic character. She makes a drastic change from the beginning acts to now. In the beginning, Emilia was subservient and quiet. She didn't stand up to Iago and just let him insult her in front of her friends. Now, in act five, after dramatic deaths, Emilia is more active in asserting her views. She becomes direct, forceful, and nonintimidated. She finally stands up for herself and Desdemona. She is not afraid to stand up to Othello and let him know that he unjustly murdered his wife because Desdemona was nothing but faithful. This dramatic change in Emilia's character shows that everyone can change and most people have an inner tiger just waiting to let loose. For Emilia, her inner tiger was released when she watched multiple people die because of what she would later discover to be her husband's lies and manipulation. I think this helps show that truly only Iago knew what he was doing and nobody could have predicted this outcome (except Iago).
In the fifth act, readers are shown that Emilia is a dynamic character. She makes a drastic change from the beginning acts to now. In the beginning, Emilia was subservient and quiet. She didn't stand up to Iago and just let him insult her in front of her friends. Now, in act five, after dramatic deaths, Emilia is more active in asserting her views. She becomes direct, forceful, and nonintimidated. She finally stands up for herself and Desdemona. She is not afraid to stand up to Othello and let him know that he unjustly murdered his wife because Desdemona was nothing but faithful. This dramatic change in Emilia's character shows that everyone can change and most people have an inner tiger just waiting to let loose. For Emilia, her inner tiger was released when she watched multiple people die because of what she would later discover to be her husband's lies and manipulation. I think this helps show that truly only Iago knew what he was doing and nobody could have predicted this outcome (except Iago).
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Plays: Othello 3
"I humbly thank you for't. I never knew
A Florentine more kind and honest."--Cassio (1403: III. i. 37-38)
This quote is an instance of dramatic irony. The audience has been informed from Iago's soliloquies that everything he is advising people to do is for his own gain. He could care less if Roderigo gets the girl. There is dramatic irony because the characters think that Iago is really trying to help them. Roderigo thinks that Iago is giving him advice on how to win Desdemona's heart. However, Iago is using Roderigo to make people mad, so that he can get the position he wants. Likewise, Cassio thinks that Iago is helping him get back in favor with Othello, but he is actually tricking him and setting him up to mess up even more. The purpose of the dramatic irony is to reveal to the audience another side of Iago's personality. It also creates suspense because readers are drawn into the action because they know Iago's true intentions. It is effective because the characters act as if they truly believe that Iago is being helpful. The characters and readers have different understandings of situations, so they are expecting different results.
A Florentine more kind and honest."--Cassio (1403: III. i. 37-38)
This quote is an instance of dramatic irony. The audience has been informed from Iago's soliloquies that everything he is advising people to do is for his own gain. He could care less if Roderigo gets the girl. There is dramatic irony because the characters think that Iago is really trying to help them. Roderigo thinks that Iago is giving him advice on how to win Desdemona's heart. However, Iago is using Roderigo to make people mad, so that he can get the position he wants. Likewise, Cassio thinks that Iago is helping him get back in favor with Othello, but he is actually tricking him and setting him up to mess up even more. The purpose of the dramatic irony is to reveal to the audience another side of Iago's personality. It also creates suspense because readers are drawn into the action because they know Iago's true intentions. It is effective because the characters act as if they truly believe that Iago is being helpful. The characters and readers have different understandings of situations, so they are expecting different results.
Plays: Othello 2
"Come on, come on. You are pictures out of doors,
Bells in your parlors, wildcats in your kitchens,
Saints in your injuries, devils being offended,
Players in your housewifery, and housewives in your beds."--Iago (1386: II.i.109-112)
This quote from Othello contains metaphors. In this situation, Iago is talking about his wife. The things he is saying about her do not seem to be flattering. in fact, they are rather offensive. He is basically saying she is too loud, in the way, and the opposite of what one would want in a wife. I think this is rather rude. This quote and the way Iago treats his wife in general is a way for us to learn his character. He treats people as means to get what he wants. He is only concerned with his own goals and needs. I think that Iago not only treats his wife badly, but he also uses and takes advantage of all of his "friends." Iago seems to be a pretty selfish, grudge-holding, and mean person. I am a little puzzled; however, that Iago doesn't seemed satisfied with his wife, yet he is super angry at Othello for sleeping with her.
Bells in your parlors, wildcats in your kitchens,
Saints in your injuries, devils being offended,
Players in your housewifery, and housewives in your beds."--Iago (1386: II.i.109-112)
This quote from Othello contains metaphors. In this situation, Iago is talking about his wife. The things he is saying about her do not seem to be flattering. in fact, they are rather offensive. He is basically saying she is too loud, in the way, and the opposite of what one would want in a wife. I think this is rather rude. This quote and the way Iago treats his wife in general is a way for us to learn his character. He treats people as means to get what he wants. He is only concerned with his own goals and needs. I think that Iago not only treats his wife badly, but he also uses and takes advantage of all of his "friends." Iago seems to be a pretty selfish, grudge-holding, and mean person. I am a little puzzled; however, that Iago doesn't seemed satisfied with his wife, yet he is super angry at Othello for sleeping with her.
Plays: Othello 1
"Tush, never tell me! I take it much unkindly
That thou, Iago, who hast had my purse
As if the strings were thine, shouldst know of this." --Roderigo (1362: I. i. 1-3)
This play begins in medias res. It begins in the middle of something and readers are uncertain as to what was going on prior to our introduction. I am not sure what the purpose of this is, but readers are able to infer what the conversation was about because some of it is given to the readers. However, we are never told what Iago was not supposed to tell Roderigo. The scene that begins the play is hardly introductory. Like I said before, we are thrown into the thick of things right off the bat. In the first few pages, we begin to know that Iago is upset because he was not picked to be the Lieutenant even though he had the seniority and skills. At this point, I do not think that readers are missing out on anything by the play starting in medias res because Shakespeare wouldn't have started the play without vital information. The information at the beginning and Iago's wrath over not being pick for lieutenant carries on throughout the act as something constantly gnawing at his conscience and driving him crazy.
That thou, Iago, who hast had my purse
As if the strings were thine, shouldst know of this." --Roderigo (1362: I. i. 1-3)
This play begins in medias res. It begins in the middle of something and readers are uncertain as to what was going on prior to our introduction. I am not sure what the purpose of this is, but readers are able to infer what the conversation was about because some of it is given to the readers. However, we are never told what Iago was not supposed to tell Roderigo. The scene that begins the play is hardly introductory. Like I said before, we are thrown into the thick of things right off the bat. In the first few pages, we begin to know that Iago is upset because he was not picked to be the Lieutenant even though he had the seniority and skills. At this point, I do not think that readers are missing out on anything by the play starting in medias res because Shakespeare wouldn't have started the play without vital information. The information at the beginning and Iago's wrath over not being pick for lieutenant carries on throughout the act as something constantly gnawing at his conscience and driving him crazy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)